Tariffs: Economic ‘Disaster’

The Tariff Trap: Why 1,600 Economists Are Sounding the Alarm
Picture this: It’s Black Friday 2018. Shelves are stripped bare, shoppers are fistfighting over discounted TVs, and somewhere in the chaos, a retail worker named Michael Munger has an existential crisis. Fast-forward to today, and that same guy—now a former FTC economist—is leading a chorus of 1,600 economists (including Nobel laureates and ex-presidential advisors) in a full-throated roast of U.S. tariff policies. Their verdict? A “self-inflicted economic disaster” wrapped in political ribbon. Let’s unpack why the receipts don’t lie.
—
The Case Against Tariffs: A Triple Threat
1. The Consumer Shakedown
Tariffs might as well come with a neon sign flashing “Tax Hike Here.” By jacking up prices on imports—from steel to semiconductors—they force U.S. businesses to either absorb costs (hello, profit margins) or pass them to consumers (hello, inflation). Take the 2018 aluminum tariffs: They spiked soda can costs by 3%, proving even your Diet Coke habit isn’t safe. Economists call this “deadweight loss”; shoppers call it “why is my grocery bill auditioning for a horror movie?”
But wait, there’s more! Tariffs love a *plot twist*. When China retaliated with agricultural tariffs, U.S. soybean farmers lost $7.7 billion in exports overnight. Cue the *Curb Your Enthusiasm* theme.
2. The 1930s Called—They Want Their Bad Policy Back
History nerds will recognize the *Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act* of 1930, the economic equivalent of setting your wallet on fire. Those tariffs deepened the Great Depression by tanking global trade by 66%. Today’s playbook? Eerily similar. The Fed’s 2024 data shows manufacturing confidence flatlining, with PMI scores sulking below the “growth” line for three straight months. Pro tip: When economists start name-dropping the 1930s, it’s not for vintage aesthetic.
3. The Global Side-Eye
Tariffs are the roommate who eats your leftovers *and* leaves passive-aggressive notes. The EU’s Bruegel Institute estimates they’ve shrunk global trade by 0.5–1%, disproportionately smacking emerging markets. Meanwhile, the WTO rolls its eyes as the U.S. sidelines multilateral talks. Spoiler: Trade wars aren’t “won”—they’re just mutually assured frustration.
—
Better Tools for the Job
If tariffs are a sledgehammer, economists prefer scalpels:
– WTO Frameworks: Actual rules! Imagine!
– Tech Subsidies: Fund domestic R&D instead of taxing imports. (See: CHIPS Act’s $52 billion for semiconductors.)
– Labor Standards: Upgrade trade deals to protect workers *without* igniting price wars.
The irony? America’s own success stories—like Boeing’s export boom—stem from *open* markets, not Fortress Economics.
—
The Bottom Line
This economist uprising isn’t just academic gossip. It’s a flashing neon warning that tariffs backfire—hiking prices, alienating allies, and recycling Depression-era mistakes. As 2025 policy debates loom, the question isn’t “Are tariffs bad?” (Spoiler: Yes.). It’s “Will politicians finally read the room?” The receipts are in. The jury’s out. And the mall mole’s watching. *Drops mic.*