Trump’s 100-Day Approval Rating Hits 80-Year Low: Tariff Warnings and Economic Concerns
The first 100 days of a presidency often set the tone for an administration, offering a glimpse into its priorities, challenges, and public reception. For Donald Trump, this period was anything but conventional. Marked by controversy, polarizing policies, and a relentless media storm, his early tenure shattered historical norms—most notably, his approval ratings. Polls revealed Trump’s approval hovering around 40%, the lowest for any U.S. president in 80 years. This historic slump wasn’t just a blip; it reflected deep unease over his trade policies, particularly aggressive tariffs, and their potential to destabilize the economy. Former White House officials and economists sounded alarms, warning of trade wars, higher consumer costs, and global backlash. As the administration forged ahead, the question loomed: Were these policies a bold recalibration of American trade or a reckless gamble with the economy?
—
The Historic Low Approval Rating: A Presidency Without a Honeymoon
New presidents typically enjoy a “honeymoon period,” a brief window of bipartisan goodwill and public optimism. Trump, however, faced skepticism from day one. His approval ratings, stuck near 40%, contrasted sharply with predecessors like Barack Obama (65%), George W. Bush (58%), and even Jimmy Carter (63%), who presided over economic stagnation. The divergence wasn’t just partisan—it was cultural. Trump’s combative rhetoric, policy flip-flops (see: healthcare repeal efforts), and Twitter-fueled feuds alienated moderates and intensified Democratic opposition.
– The Loyal Base vs. the Skeptical Middle: While his core supporters cheered his “America First” slogans, independents bristled at chaotic governance. A *Pew Research* poll showed only 32% of independents approved of his performance, a critical weak spot.
– Media as Foil and Amplifier: Trump’s adversarial relationship with the press became a defining feature. His cries of “fake news” energized his base but eroded trust among swing voters, who saw his attacks as undermining democratic norms.
– Legislative Stumbles: Failed attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act and delayed infrastructure plans left the impression of a stalled agenda, further denting his credibility.
The numbers weren’t just a popularity contest—they signaled a presidency struggling to expand its coalition, a vulnerability that would shape its policy gambles.
—
Tariff Policies: Economic Patriotism or Self-Sabotage?
Trump’s aggressive tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) were pitched as a revival of American manufacturing. But economists and former advisors warned they risked triggering a domino effect of retaliation and inflation.
Gary Cohn, Trump’s former chief economic advisor, resigned over the tariffs, calling them a “tax on consumers.” Internal reports revealed a split between protectionists (like trade advisor Peter Navarro) and globalists (like Cohn), with Trump often siding with the former. The result? Policy whiplash—one day threatening tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods, the next delaying them amid negotiations.
– Consumer Pain: Tariffs raised costs for manufacturers using steel and aluminum, from automakers to beer brewers. Companies like Harley-Davidson announced plans to shift production overseas to avoid penalties.
– Retaliation Hits Home: China slapped tariffs on U.S. soybeans, crushing farmers in Trump-friendly states. The EU targeted bourbon and motorcycles, politically symbolic blows.
– Market Jitters: The S&P 500 swung wildly with each tariff announcement, reflecting investor fears of prolonged uncertainty.
Beyond immediate costs, tariffs threatened to isolate the U.S. economically. NAFTA renegotiations grew tense as Canada and Mexico retaliated. Meanwhile, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) moved forward without the U.S., ceding trade influence to China. “We’re playing checkers while Beijing plays chess,” lamented one Republican senator.
—
Backlash and the Road Ahead: Can Trump Course-Correct?
The political fallout was swift. Democrats, energized by Trump’s low ratings, flipped congressional seats in 2018 midterms, while businesses lobbied fiercely against tariffs. Even allies like Germany’s Angela Merkel criticized the policies as “isolationist.”
– The Midterm Wildcard: Historically, presidents with sub-50% approval see major midterm losses. Trump’s ratings suggested Democrats could reclaim the House, jeopardizing his agenda.
– Business Rebellion: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, typically Republican-aligned, launched a campaign against tariffs, warning of job losses in key industries.
– Diplomatic Fallout: Trade wars strained relationships with allies, complicating efforts to rally support against shared threats like North Korea.
Yet, Trump’s base saw the turmoil as proof he was “shaking up the system.” The question was whether that disruption would yield results—or chaos.
—
Final Analysis: A High-Stakes Gamble
Trump’s 100-day approval slump was more than a headline—it was a referendum on his disruptive style. The tariff debate encapsulated the divide: supporters hailed them as tough negotiation, while critics saw economic self-harm. With consumer prices creeping up, farmers reeling, and allies alienated, the administration faced mounting pressure to pivot. Could Trump reconcile his populist instincts with economic reality? Or would doubling down deepen the rift? One thing was clear: the stakes extended far beyond approval polls. The economy—and America’s place in the global order—hung in the balance.
发表回复