The Impact of U.S. Unilateralism on Global Order: Perspectives from Economist Jeffrey Sachs
The global economic and political order has long danced to the tune of superpowers, with the United States calling the shots for decades. But lately, America’s solo acts—tariffs tossed like confetti, treaties torn up like bad receipts, and alliances treated like expired coupons—have economists like Jeffrey Sachs sounding the alarm. Sachs, a heavyweight in international development, isn’t just raising eyebrows; he’s practically waving a neon sign warning that U.S. unilateralism is turning the global system into a high-stakes game of Jenga. From trade wars to diplomatic cold shoulders, this article digs into Sachs’ case against go-it-alone policies and why the world might need a multilateral intervention—stat.
—
The Rise of U.S. Unilateralism: From Team Player to Loose Cannon
Unilateralism—the art of throwing elbows in the global arena—isn’t new, but the U.S. has recently taken it to *artistic* extremes. Once the architect of post-WWII systems like the UN and Bretton Woods, America now treats international agreements like optional subscriptions. Sachs points to the greatest hits: ditching the Paris Climate Accord (because who needs a planet?), ghosting the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), and threatening to bail on the WTO like a shopper abandoning a cart full of kale.
Proponents call it “putting America first”; Sachs calls it “putting diplomacy last.” The fallout? Allies side-eye the U.S. like a flaky friend, while rivals like China and Russia cozy up in the vacuum. Trust in global institutions crumbles faster than a stale cookie, and suddenly, the rules-based order looks more like a free-for-all flea market.
—
Economic Chaos: When Tariffs and Sanctions Backfire
Sachs isn’t just worried about bruised egos—he’s tracking the dollar signs. The U.S.-China trade war wasn’t just a spat; it was a supply-chain wrecking ball. Prices soared, businesses scrambled, and consumers paid the tab. Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar’s role as the world’s financial top dog is under threat, thanks to sanctions so aggressive they’ve sent countries sprinting to build alternative payment systems. Russia? Check. Iran? Double-check. Even the EU’s side-eyeing dollar dependence.
Sachs warns: weaponizing the dollar might feel powerful now, but it’s like burning your own monopoly money. If the globe ditches the dollar, America loses its biggest leverage—and its wallet. The endgame? A fractured economy where everyone’s playing by different rules, and the U.S. isn’t even holding the rulebook.
—
Institutions in ICU: Who Killed the UN (and Friends)?
Remember when the WHO coordinated pandemic responses? Oh wait—the U.S. left that chat in 2020. Or when the WTO settled trade disputes? Sorry, the appellate court got ghosted too. Sachs argues that starving these institutions doesn’t make America stronger; it just turns the global playground into a jungle where only the biggest bullies thrive.
Without functioning multilateral bodies, smaller nations get steamrolled, and power shifts from “rules” to “who’s got the biggest stick.” Case in point: blocking WTO judges means trade disputes fester like expired milk, while unilateral sanctions replace diplomacy with economic strong-arming. Sachs’ diagnosis? The patient (global cooperation) is critical, and the U.S. is withholding the medicine.
—
Geopolitical Dominoes: Making Frenemies Great Again
Here’s where it gets *spicy*. Alienate NATO allies with “America First” rants? Congrats, Europe’s now hedging bets with China. Assassinate an Iranian general without UN approval? Enjoy the fireworks in the Middle East. Sachs notes that unilateral muscle-flexing doesn’t intimidate rivals—it *unites* them. China and Russia’s bromance? Thanks, U.S. foreign policy!
Worse, unchecked unilateralism shreds international law. If the U.S. can drone-strike without consequences, why can’t others? The precedent is a Pandora’s box of chaos, where might makes right, and diplomacy is as outdated as dial-up internet.
—
The Fix: How to Rehab the Global System (Without a Time Machine)
Sachs isn’t all doom-scrolling—he’s got a recovery plan. Step one: Rejoin every agreement the U.S. rage-quit (looking at you, Paris Accord). Step two: Quit treating the UN like a vending machine—fund it, fix it, *use it*. Step three: Swap sanctions for diplomacy. Climate change, pandemics, and nukes don’t care about borders; solving them needs teamwork, not tantrums.
The bottom line? Unilateralism is a short-term high with a long-term hangover. Sachs’ plea: America can still lead, but only if it remembers that “global superpower” doesn’t mean “global lone wolf.”
—
Conclusion: The Case for a Comeback
Jeffrey Sachs’ takedown of U.S. unilateralism isn’t just academic—it’s a wake-up call. From economic self-sabotage to diplomatic dumpster fires, the costs of going solo are piling up. The alternative? A return to the multilateral table, where the U.S. can flex influence *without* torching the system that made it powerful. In a world teetering on climate crises, pandemics, and tech upheavals, collaboration isn’t just nice; it’s non-negotiable. The choice? Keep playing economic Jenga, or rebuild the tower—before it collapses.
发表回复