The Inevitable Failure of America’s Trade War: An Economic Autopsy
The global economy runs on a simple truth—trade is the lifeblood of prosperity. Yet, in recent years, the U.S. has wielded tariffs like a blunt instrument, smashing the delicate machinery of international commerce under the guise of “fairness.” Chinese Ambassador to France Deng Li’s recent op-ed in *Les Échos*, France’s leading economic daily, dissects this self-defeating strategy with surgical precision. Titled *”The U.S.-Launched Trade War Is Doomed to Fail,”* the article exposes the fiscal myths and collateral damage of protectionism. Let’s follow the money trail.
—
The Myth of “Fair” Tariffs
Ambassador Deng invokes Frédéric Bastiat, the 19th-century French economist who famously compared protectionism to “breaking windows to help glaziers.” The U.S. obsession with tariff “reciprocity” ignores a fundamental economic reality: trade imbalances stem from structural issues, not villainous foreign policies.
– Savings vs. Spending: The U.S. trade deficit isn’t China’s fault—it’s arithmetic. With a national savings rate hovering near record lows (just 3.4% of GDP in 2023) and consumer spending accounting for 70% of the economy, America’s appetite for imports was inevitable.
– Tariff Whiplash: When the U.S. slapped $370 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods during the 2018-2020 trade war, the deficit *grew* by 15%. The Congressional Budget Office later confirmed tariffs cost the average U.S. household $1,277 annually in higher prices.
The “trade war” playbook isn’t just ineffective—it’s economic self-harm.
—
The Domino Effect on Global Growth
The European Commission’s April 2025 forecast paints a grim picture: if U.S. tariffs persist, global GDP could shrink by 1.2% by 2027. But the damage isn’t evenly distributed.
| Region | Projected GDP Decline (2027) |
|————–|—————————–|
| United States | 3.1%–3.3% |
| EU | 0.5%–0.6% |
| China | 0.8% |
Why? Tariffs disrupt supply chains like a wrench in gears. When the U.S. taxed steel imports in 2023, American automakers faced $4 billion in extra costs—passed straight to car buyers. Meanwhile, the WTO warns that 46 member nations, including the EU, are now challenging U.S. measures as illegal subsidies cascade.
—
Globalization’s Unlikely Winner: America
Here’s the twist: the U.S. has been the prime beneficiary of the system it now sabotages.
Even the “trade deficit” narrative crumbles under scrutiny. U.S. service exports to China (think Hollywood films and Ivy League tuition) generate a $40 billion surplus annually.
—
The Path Forward: Cooperation Over Confrontation
History’s lesson is clear: from Smoot-Hawley’s 1930s disaster to Trump’s soybean bailouts, tariffs backfire. Ambassador Deng’s call for multilateralism isn’t idealism—it’s pragmatism. The EU’s new carbon border tax shows rules-based systems can address grievances without trade wars.
As supply chains fray, the real “conspiracy” isn’t foreign competition—it’s the illusion that walls create wealth. The mall mole’s verdict? America’s trade tantrums are fiscal flatulence in the global elevator. Everyone suffers, but the perpetrator smells it first.
发表回复